17-CV-1208 Rikkers v. Menard, Inc.
Order Granting Summary Judgment
Plaintiff argued that Menard’s mail-in rebate involved added expenses that deprived him of the full value of the claimed “11%” rebate. Because the term “rebate” contemplates Menard’s practices, the Court granted summary judgment for Menard’s.
20-CV-1090 French et al v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company et al
Decision and Order
Complaint seeking to revise state-approved insurance rates was dismissed via judgment on the pleadings. The Filed Rate Doctrine barred all of Plaintiffs’ claims.
20-CV-836 Weeks v. Credit One Bank, et al
Decision and Order
Complaint seeking recovery under Fair Credit Reporting Act was dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff’s assertions that defendants committed only bare procedural violations, divorced from any concrete harm, did not satisfy injury-in-fact requirement of Article III.
17-CV-313 Archer-Daniels-Midland Co v. Country Visions Coop
Decision and Order Affirming Bankruptcy Court
Bankruptcy court’s decision denying real estate purchaser’s motion to enforce plan confirmation order against holder of right of first refusal was not legally or factually erroneous. The holder of the ROFR had not received sufficient notice to protect its interest before the property was sold; and because the purchaser knew or should have known of the defect in title, it could not claim bona fide purchaser status.
17-CV-1403 City of Milwaukee v City Wide
Decision and Order Affirming Bankruptcy Court
Bankruptcy court correctly applied law when denying debtor a discharge under 11 U.S.C. §727(a)(4)(A).
17-CV-1635 State v. Hansen
Decision and Order Reversing Bankruptcy Court
Bankruptcy court incorrectly concluded that penalty DWD assessed against debtor for failure to maintain worker’s compensation insurance fell outside the exception to discharge in 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(7).
19-CV-1051 Peterson v. DC Docks
Decision and Order Affirming Bankruptcy Court
Bankruptcy court’s valuation of property sold at tax foreclosure sale, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §550(a), was not legally erroneous.
20-CV-1785 Donald J. Trump v. The Wisconsin Elections Commission, et al
Decision and Order
President of the United States brought an action under §1983 against the Wisconsin Elections Commission and various officials, alleging that his rights under the Electors Clause were violated. The Court dismissed the complaint with prejudice.
