20-CV-1771 Feehan v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, et al
Order Granting Defendants’ Motions To Dismiss
Order dismissing suit for injunctive relief seeking decertification of Wisconsin results of 2020 general election.
16-CV-1508 Cree v. BHB Energy, et al.
Order granting default judgment as to defendant BHP and ruling on motion for sanctions
After extensive litigation, the court denied the plaintiff's motion for sanctions as to the non-party former principle whom the plaintiff had argued deliberately evaded service, but granted sanctions as to the corporate defendant.
17-CV-827 Popsockets, LLC v. Hueffner
Order ruling on several motions
The court denied the plaintiff's motions to dismiss, for default judgment and other motions, while expressing concerns about the trouble the plaintiff had been forced to go to serve the defendant.
16-CV-1504 Moorer v. Always Towing, et al.
Denial of defendant's motion to dismiss
The court denied the collection agency's motion to dismiss, concluding that the complaint stated plausible claims for illegal repossession, civil theft, conversion and illegal debt collection, based on the plaintiff's allegations that the notice of right to cure was deficient.
16-CV-1350 Don Johnson Hayward Motors, et al. v. General Motors
Order denying plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of defendant
The court held that the manufacturer's proposed "cost-recovery" plan, to recover the cost of warranty reimbursements under Wis. Stat. section 218.0125 from those dealers who request reimbursement did not violate that statute.
16-CV-1255 Dobek v. USA
Order denying habeas petition and dismissing case
The court denied the petition for writ of habeas corpus, concluding that the comments of the district court who dismiss the first indictment against him did not bar the government from re-indicting him.
14-CV-1218 Long v. Kaplan
Order denying both parties' motions for summary judgment.
18-CR-120 USA v. Jordan Kubasiak
Order adopting report and recommendations and denying motion to suppress.
The court ruled that surveillance footage from a stationary surveillance camera police placed in a neighbor's home (with the neighbor's consent) did not violate the Fourth Amendment, despite the fact that it had recorded the defendant's back yard 24/7 for several weeks.
17-CR-90 USA v. Bell
Order Overruling Defendant’s Objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, Adopting that Recommendation and Denying Defendant’s Motion to Suppress
17-CR-184 USA v. Walker
Order Adopting Recommendation and Denying the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Indictment
