18-CV-1890 Sartin et al v. Chula Vista Inc et al
18-CV-1890 Sartin et al v. Chula Vista Inc et al
Decision and Order
18-CV-1890 Sartin et al v. Chula Vista Inc et al
Decision and Order
20-CV-954 Marquette University v. Kuali Inc
Decision and Order
20-CV-1327 Canyon Custom Home Builders Inc v. Somerset Condominium Association Inc
Decision and Order
20-CV-1563 Kohler Co v. Whistling Oak Apartments LLC
Decision and Order
19-CV-1003 Cantu v. Ventura Foods LLC
Decision and Order
19-CV-1092 Outlaw v. Village of Shorewood
Decision and Order
20-CV-1585 Crumble v. Kettle Moraine School District
Decision and Order
20-CV-706 FTUTB, Inc. v. Wisconsin Surgery Center, LLC
Decision and Order
18-CV-923 Hayes v. Wisconsin & Southern Railroad LLC et al
Decision and Order Granting Motion to Dismiss
If presented with the question, the Wisconsin Supreme Court would likely hold that an insurer cannot, under a theory of unjust enrichment, seek reimbursement from its insured for the costs it expended defending a claim for which the policy did not provide coverage.
18-CV-1539 Neuzerling et al v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
Decision and Order Granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment