21-CV-1066 Schroeder v. City of Muskego
21-CV-1066 Schroeder v. City of Muskego
Order
The plaintiff moved for leave to amend his complaint challenging the City of Muskego’s sex offender ordinance. The court concluded that the City would not be prejudiced by the amendment. Further, the court concluded that the amended complaint stated a plausible claim that Section 294-3(D) of the City’s sex offender ordinance was an unconstitutional ex post facto law. Therefore, the court gave the plaintiff leave to amend.