18-CV-923 Hayes v. Wisconsin & Southern Railroad LLC et al
Decision and Order Granting Motion to Dismiss
If presented with the question, the Wisconsin Supreme Court would likely hold that an insurer cannot, under a theory of unjust enrichment, seek reimbursement from its insured for the costs it expended defending a claim for which the policy did not provide coverage.
17-CV-1403 City of Milwaukee v City Wide
Decision and Order Affirming Bankruptcy Court
Bankruptcy court correctly applied law when denying debtor a discharge under 11 U.S.C. §727(a)(4)(A).
17-CV-1635 State v. Hansen
Decision and Order Reversing Bankruptcy Court
Bankruptcy court incorrectly concluded that penalty DWD assessed against debtor for failure to maintain worker’s compensation insurance fell outside the exception to discharge in 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(7).
19-CV-1051 Peterson v. DC Docks
Decision and Order Affirming Bankruptcy Court
Bankruptcy court’s valuation of property sold at tax foreclosure sale, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §550(a), was not legally erroneous.
18-CV-1539 Neuzerling et al v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
Decision and Order Granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
20-CV-371 Hydraulics International Inc v. Amalga Composites Inc
Decision and Order Denying Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
Under the UCC and the facts of the case, whether the time limitation included in a seller’s invoice is part of the parties’ agreement is a question of fact that the court cannot resolve on a motion to dismiss.