24-CV-1281 Champion Power Equipment Inc. v. Generac Power Systems Inc.
24-CV-1281 Champion Power Equipment Inc. v. Generac Power Systems Inc.
Omnibus Decision and Order
You are here
Lynn Adelman
24-CR-164 USA v. Peter Braun
24-CR-164 USA v. Peter Braun
Decision and Order
The court granted the defendant’s motion to suppress. The court determined that the “private search” doctrine did not authorize law enforcement to conduct a warrantless examination of the contents of a digital file forwarded by an electronic service provider (“ESP”) where the ESP had not visually inspected the contents of that file. The court further determined that the “good faith” doctrine, recognized in Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229 (2011), did not apply under these circumstances.
25-CR-89 USA v. Hannah Dugan
25-CR-89 USA v. Hannah Dugan
Decision and Order
The court denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss. The court concluded that the defendant failed to establish absolute judicial immunity for the acts alleged in the indictment. The court further concluded that the Tenth Amendment did not preclude the charges. Finally, the court determined that the canon of constitutional avoidance was inapplicable.
23-CV-876 Jane Doe #1 v. Mukwonago Area School District et al
23-CV-876 Jane Doe #1 v. Mukwonago Area School District et al
Decision and Order
Decision and Order - 24-CV-1519 Green v. Olympus Group Inc
24-CV-1519 Green v. Olympus Group Inc
Decision and Order
23-CV-1241 SO v. Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department et al
23-CV-1241 SO v. Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department et al
Decision and Order
24-CV-1281 Champion Power Equipment Inc v. Generac Power Systems Inc
24-CV-1281 Champion Power Equipment Inc v. Generac Power Systems Inc
Decision and Order
22-CV-610 Uriel Pharmacy Health and Welfare Plan et al v. Advocate Aurora Health Inc et al 24-CV-157 Shaw et al v Advocate Aurora Health Inc et al
22-CV-610 Uriel Pharmacy Health and Welfare Plan et al v. Advocate Aurora Health Inc et al
24-CV-157 Shaw et al v Advocate Aurora Health Inc et al
Decision and Order
In an antitrust case involving allegations of vertical restraints in the market for health care services, the court decided seven motions to compel discovery. The court’s order addresses various issues concerning discovery in a large antitrust case, including matters relating to electronic discovery.
24-CV-845 Signature Flight Support LLC v. Johnson Controls (15)
24-CV-845 Signature Flight Support LLC v. Johnson Controls
Decision and Order
24-CV-845 Signature Flight Support LLC v. Johnson Controls (14)
24-CV-845 Signature Flight Support LLC v. Johnson Controls
Decision and Order
Pages
