You are here

Lynn Adelman

11-CV-560 United States v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.

11-CV-560 United States v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.

Decision and Order

The court granted summary judgment to the United States on its claim that a government contractor’s agreement with its subcontractor involved a cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost system of contracting, in violation of 10 U.S.C. sec. 2306(a). The court also denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment based on judicial estoppel.

15-CV-1157 Eaton Corp v. Westport Insurance

15-CV-1157 Eaton Corp v. Westport Insurance

Decision and Order

The court held that an insured’s claim for declaratory relief to establish coverage for asbestos claims against high-level excess liability insurers was not ripe, and therefore did not present a case or controversy under Article II of the Constitution, because the insured had not shown a practical likelihood of reaching the excess insurers’ attachment points.

21-CV-243 Gatzke, et al v. City of West Bend, et al

21-CV-243 Gatzke, et al v. City of West Bend, et al

Decision and Order

The court dismissed a claim under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 for failure to give the alleged violator proper pre-suit notice of the alleged violations. The court determined that the notice was defective because it did not provide information sufficient for the alleged violator to determine the date or dates of the alleged violations.

20-CV-349 Conforti v. City of Franklin

20-CV-349 Conforti v. City of Franklin

Decision and Order

In a case alleging that the defendant police officers used excessive force during an arrest, the court held that an officer could be liable both for using excessive force and for failing to intervene in his partner’s use of excessive force. However, the plaintiff could not recover damages twice for the same injuries.

21-CV-447 Camelot Banquet Rooms v. US Small Business Administration

21-CV-447 Camelot Banquet Rooms v. US Small Business Administration

Order

In a prior order, the court enjoined the U.S. Small Business Administration from excluding strip clubs from the second-draw Paycheck Protection Program because they present “live performances of a prurient sexual nature.” In this order, the court denied the government’s motion to stay the injunction pending appeal.

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Lynn Adelman