23-CV-1355 Russo et al v. BRP US Inc et al
23-CV-1355 Russo et al v. BRP US Inc et al
Decision and Order
You are here
Lynn Adelman
23-MD-3078 Generac Solar Power Systems Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation
23-MD-3078 Generac Solar Power Systems Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation
Decision and Order
The court decided a partial motion to dismiss a class action complaint in a consumer multidistrict litigation alleging economic losses caused by a defective solar energy power system.
23-MD-3078 Generac Solar Power Systems Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation
23-MD-3078 Generac Solar Power Systems Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation
Decision and Order
The court determined that it had diversity and supplemental subject-matter jurisdiction to adjudicate a claim under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act even though the claim did not satisfy the amount-in-controversy and other requirements of the Act’s jurisdiction-conferring provision.
21-CV-326 Spencer v. Meisner
21-CV-326 Spencer v. Meisner
Decision and Order
The court granted petitioner Jared Spencer’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The court found that the state court relied on materially inaccurate information at sentencing in violation of petitioner’s due process right to be sentenced on the basis of accurate information. The court further found that the Wisconsin Court of Appeals unreasonably applied Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 (1967), in its harmless error analysis.
11-CV-560 USA et al v. Skirosky Aircraft Corp et al
11-CV-560 USA et al v. Skirosky Aircraft Corp et al
Decision and Order
The court decided eleven motions in limine.
21-CV-848 Estate of Alvin Cole v. Mensah et al
21-CV-848 Estate of Alvin Cole v. Mensah et al
Decision and Order
23-CV-458 Story v. Marquette University
23-CV-458 Story v. Marquette University
Decision and Order
23-CV-1543 Kayla Peterson v. Racine Unified School District
23-CV-1543 Kayla Peterson v. Racine Unified School District
Decision and Order
23-CV-159 Hulce v. Zipongo Inc
23-CV-159 Hulce v. Zipongo Inc
Decision and Order
In a case alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s do-not-call regulation, the court determined that a call to the plaintiff urging him to utilize a free service available under his health insurance did not “encourage the purchase” of any good or service and therefore was not a “telephone solicitation” within the meaning of the Act.
11-CV-560 United States of America et al v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation et al
11-CV-560 United States of America et al v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation et al
Decision and Order
The court decided motions to exclude expert testimony in a case involving government contracting and the False Claims Act.
Pages
